WORKING COPY

GRAND-DADDY OF ALL LEGAL CASES

Form 14E

Courts of Justice Act

notice of application

Court File No.

ONTARIO

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE_________

BETWEEN:

ROGER CALLOW

Self-represented Appellant

and

1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

and

2) Ministry of Transport-Medical File: 001111960

Respondents

(Court seal)

notice of application

TO THE RESPONDENT(S)

A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED by the applicant. The claim made by the applicant appears on the following page.

THIS APPLICATION will come on for a hearing on (day), (date), at (time), at 161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2K1

IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, to receive notice of any step in the application or to be served with any documents in the application, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must forthwith prepare a notice of appearance in Form 38A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant’s lawyer or, where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing.

IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE COURT OR TO EXAMINE OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES ON THE APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must, in addition to serving your notice of appearance, serve a copy of the evidence on the applicant’s lawyer or, where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in the court office where the application is to be heard as soon as possible, but at least four days before the hearing.

IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE.

Date NOVEMBER 22, 2019.................................... Issued by ...........................................................................

Local registrar

Address of

court office ..161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2K1

.........................................................................

TO 1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

2446 Bank Street. Ste. 201 Ottawa K1V 1A4 t.613-739-0998

and

2) Ministry of Transport-Medical File: 001111960

22 Wellesley St. W. Box 589 Toronto, ON M7A 1N3 f.416-235-3400

application

1. The applicant makes application for: FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DISCLOSURE FROM BOTH

PARTIES AS THEY RELATE TO THE DRIVER LICENSE SUSPENSION OF THE

APPELLANT. WITHOUT THE COMPLETE RECORD OF THE APPELLANT'S

MEDICAL FILE, NO ONE CHARGED WITH TESTING FOR RENEWAL

PURPOSES MAY ACT.

2. The grounds for the application are: THIS CASE HITS AT THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE

CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS (1982) WHEREIN THE APPELLANT IS

EFFECTIVELY DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW DUE TO THE

PERNICIOUS CO-JOINING OF THE TERMS 'PSYCHIATRIC CONDITION' UNDER

THE 'HIGHWAYS ACT' CREATING THE NOTION OF A 'STATELESS CITIZEN'.

NOT ONLY MEDICAL DOCTORS REFUSE TO ACT ON THIS FILE BUT NO LEGAL

COUNSEL MAY ACT ON THE APPELLANT'S BEHALF ON ANY LEVEL

3. The following documentary evidence will be used at the hearing of the application: (List the affidavits or other documentary evidence to be relied on.)

EXHIBIT 'A' TIES THIS MATTER INTO A HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL LABOUR

ISSUE CURRENTLY BEING STALLED BY THE PREMIER DOUG FORD

GOVERNMENT

(NOVEMBER 22-2019) ROGER CALLOW _________________________

1285 Cahill Drive #2001 Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7 t.613-521-1739

(Name, address and telephone number of lawyer or applicant)

APPLICATION UNDER (statutory provision or rule under which the application is made)

Conspiracy to deprive the Applicant in a most significant manner of medical and

legal representation.

Material as Exhibits included here along with extant File No. 19-SC-155235

(small claims court).



1.	Issues Outstanding

	(a)	liability: *quashing of driver's license suspension as being ultra vires* under the circumstances that it cannot be retestable as implied by the Ministry (See small claims court: 19-SC-155235 included in this document). As matters stand, none of the Parties to this action may acquire legal representation; a preposterous notion.** .....................................................................................................................................................................................

	(b)	damages: Two million dollars against the Defendants ..........................................................................................................................................................................................

Ministry of Ministere des 96343

Transport Transports

Ontario

77 Wellesley St. W. Box 589

Toronto, Ontario M7A 1N3

Tel.(416) 235-1773 /1-800-268-1481

Fax (416) 235-3400 /1-800-304-7889

October 21, 2019

CALLOW,ROGER,W

2001-1285 CAHILL DRIVE

OTTAWA, Ontario K1V9A7

Please use this Number 001111960 when you call or write this office.

Dear Sir:

The ministry has received a report(s) indicating that you have a condition that affects your ability to drive safely.

Your reported condition(s) is(are):

• Cognitive Impairment

• Psychiatric Condition

After considering all relevant facts available, the Registrar of Motor Vehicles has decided to suspend your driving privilege under:

• Section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act

An official notice of suspension will be mailed to you under separate cover. This action is taken for your own safety and that of other road users. Please note that if you do not hold an Ontario driver's licence (sic), this action must be taken in order to prevent you from obtaining or holding a driver's licence (sic). This is to ensure that you are medically fit for the safe operation of a motor vehicle.

What the Ministry requires from you to be reinstated:

Take this letter to your treating physician, specialist or nurse practitioner when your condition improves and have the following information sent to the Medical Review Section:

• The enclosed form(s) completed in full and all questions answered

What the Ministry will do when your information is received:

• Review the information provided against the national medical standards

THE FOLLOWING CASE is stated for the opinion of the court:

1. IN THIS MOST UNUSUAL OF LEGAL CASES, NONE OF THE LITIGANTS MAY ACQUIRE LEGAL COUNSEL DUE TO A CAPRICIOUS AND PERVERSE ORDER

FROM THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT - MEDICAL WHICH DEPRIVES THIS PLAINTIFF OF ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS MEDICAL CARE.

A Small Claims Court Action File no. 19-SC-155235 seeks to quash that aberrant Ministry Order. THE CURRENT ACTION IS DUE TO THE RETURN OF DR.

JAHAGIRDAR'S MEDICAL FILE TO ME IN AN INCOMPLETE FASHION WHICH IS NOW REQUESTED IN ITS COMPLETE FORM ALONG WITH PARALLEL

DISCLOSURE FROM THE TRANSPORT MINISTRY. THE ASSISTANCE OF OTTAWA POLICE CHIEF P. SLOLY HAS BEEN SOUGHT TO CO-ORDINATE POLICE

FORCES IN TORONTO AND GUELPH (LOCATION OF YOUNGER SON WITH POA OVER MOTHER LIVING IN OTTAWA). THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND

SURGEONS HAS ALSO BEEN NOTIFIED OF THIS ACTION AND HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THIS PLAINTIFF TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND DR. JAHAGIRDAR AND

FORBID HER TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY UNTIL THIS MATTER IS RESOLVED. THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FROM THIS PLAINTIFF FORMS THE REST OF THIS

FILED DOSSIER (Set out, in consecutively numbered paragraphs, the material facts of the case, as agreed on by the parties, that are necessary to enable the court to determine the questions stated. Refer to and include a copy of any relevant documents.)

the questions for the opinion of the court are: EVERYTHING DEPENDS ON DISCLOSURE; NAMELY A COMPLETE MEDICAL FILE FROM DR.

JAHAGIRDAR ON THIS PLAINTIFF AND MATERIAL FROM THE TRANSPORT MINISTRY-MEDICAL IMPLYING COLLUSION

requisition

TO THE LOCAL REGISTRAR at (place)

I REQUIRE COMPLETE DISCLOSURE FROM THE DEFENDANTS IN A CONSPIRACY INVOLVING ELEMENTS IN THE PREMIER DOUG FORD GOVERNMENT

RELATED TO A LONG STANDING LABOUR ISSUE AS SET OUT IN THE INCLUDED MATERIALS IN THIS ACTION (Set out a concise statement of what is sought and include all particulars necessary for the registrar to act. Where what is sought is authorized by an order, refer to the order in the requisition and attach a copy of the entered order. Where an affidavit or other document must be filed with the requisition, refer to it in the requisition and attach it.)

AFFIDAVIT of FACTS

I, Roger Callow of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, swear and affirm the following is true:

1. I turned 65 on August 24, 2006, which brought into play my pension rights;

2. My pension rights are determined on the basis of contributions to the plan, both mine and the employers;

3. The amount of these contributions is dependent on the date of termination of my employment;

4. Because I was a tenured teacher, my employment could only be determined by a proper legal process;

5. In my case the validity of the termination has never been determined. Technically although I was unable to work and was not paid, I remained a teacher under the employment of the Board;

6.I require that a proper termination date be determined, or a settlement be achieved providing me compensation which would include pensionable service benefits;

7. The recent pension inquiries caused me to examine how I could get compensation or a termination date determined. There is no other remedy I can pursue other than as requested in this petition.

8. Whatever approach is made, disclosure as outlined above is at the root of any successful remedy.

SEAL: in the Province of Ontario (Ottawa)

on OCTOBER 18-2018

(signed) ROGER CALLOW _____________________NOVEMBER 19-2019

Form 16B

Courts of Justice Act

affidavit of service

b e t w e e n:

Roger Callow

Applicant

and

1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

and

2) Ministry of Transport - Medical (Ontario)

Respondent

affidavit of service

I, ROGER CALLOW, of OTTAWA, ONTARIO MAKE OATH AND SAY (or AFFIRM):

(Service by mail as an alternative to personal service)

1. On NOVEMBER 19-2019, I sent to the DEFENDANTS 1) DR. JAHAGIRDAR

2) TRANSPORT MINISTRY-MEDICAL by regular lettermail a copy of the APPLICATION

ASSERTING A CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE PLAINTIFF OF LEGAL

REPRESENTATION

SWORN (etc.) I, ROGER CALLOW - SELF REPRESENTED PLAINTIFF ASSERT THAT

THE ABOVE APPLICATION MATERIAL WAS MAILED TO THE DEFENDANTS

WITH POST OFFICE RECEIPTS ATTACHED.

(signed) ______________________ ROGER CALLOW NOVEMBER 19-2019

N.B. Due to the incompetency of the last two Justice Ministers on this file, a

copy of this Application is being sent directly to Prime Minister J. Trudeau and

Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly. The College of Physicians and Surgeons have

been made aware of this Application on the internet: employeescasecanada.ca

2019 - RECENT 5 plus NOVEMBER SUB-HEADING: GRAND-DADDY OF ALL LEGAL CASES

(past and present for all world democracies)

EXHIBIT 'A'

1) 'THE MISSING LINK' Material connecting a labour issue involving

the Doug Ford Government and the alleged conspiracy of the

two Defendants a) Dr. Jahagirdar b) Transport Ministry-Medical

2) MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT-MEDICAL SUSPENSION NOTICE

3) File No. 19-SC-155235 -Nov. 08-2019 (Small Claims Court -Ottawa)

4 Page Document asking the Driver's License suspension to be

quashed as it is untestable for re-instatement. No Doctor can deal

with a 'psychiatric' suspension under the Highways Act (conjoined

terms) confirmed by other Doctors.

Nor may any legal counsel be represented for similar reasons.

3) 4 Pages requesting Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly to co-ordinate

police forces in Toronto (Transport Ministry-Medical) and Guelph

(home of younger son, Greg Callow, whom has POA over

his mother for both financial and medical powers) His computer

records plus that of older brother, Chris Callow, in Ottawa would,

in all likelihood, reveal the source of the materials held by

the Transport Ministry-Medical. The College of Physicians and

Surgeons have also been notified with an eye to suspending

Dr. Jahagirdar and barring her from leaving the country until this

matter is heard.

4) EXHIBIT 'D' 19-SC-155235 - Nov. 14-2019 plus other materials.

A detailed response to the returned Medical File from Doctor

Jahagirdar where she obviously did not consult with a lawyer first

so that now she has identified herself as a separate legal entity

in a second legal action filed in Superior Court for $2 million

damages justifying this action apart from the Small Claims Action

which names only the corporate body, the Towngate Medical Clinic.

EXHIBIT 'A' EXCERPTS

(Shows connection between Ford Gov't. and 'suspended license caper')

September 17-2018

'RESPONSE' to ON Supreme Court (Ottawa) File number CV 18000 769 0000

Roger Callow v West Vancouver School Trustees (S.D. #45) and two ON judges and an ON legal entity. (WRITTEN JUDGMENT ONLY - Please continue to adjudication as of this request)

BY: Roger Callow Plaintiff employeescasecanada.ca 2018 AUGUST & SEPTEMBER sub-headings

FURTHER INFORMATION FROM PLAINTIFF AVAILABLE IN WRITING IF REQUESTED BY THE COURT

MESSAGE:

1) This 'Response' has to be the most unusual legal action in Canadian jurisprudence. It is written by the Plaintiff rather than the Defendant.

2) There have been many court hearings in Canada (8 out of 10 provinces) before over 50 judges amid many accusations of judicial malfeasance by this plaintiff over the past 33 years in which the Employer always filed a Response but not now.

3) The difference lies in the fact that the courts always considered this unresolved labour matter where no compensation has been paid as a private matter which they invariably ruled as a mere frivolous & vexatious action by this plaintiff. That position was reinforced by the many oversight bodies called by the plaintiff to investigate judicial malfeasance. No such body acknowledged these complaints which would have produced public recognition.

4) Now that the charge is civil fraud for $20 million, the Defendant has filed no response, most likely because no legal firm will represent them under pain of being sued separately for fraud.

5) ON Attorney General Carolyn Mulroney failed to examine this filed case (at the beginning of her mandate) at my request checking as to the validity of an action slipped in by the departing government. Nor did she seek to establish the groundwork necessary to pursue the fraud charge against the two Ottawa Judges (Mckinnon j. and Scott j.) dating back to 2014.

6) The judge handling this case is between a rock and a hard place.

a) As to the fraud charge against the two judges and ON legal representatives for the Employer, Hicks, Morley, et al which abandoned the Employer with my accusations set before the Ontario Legal Society; it is a matter - to use a colorful analogy - of not being any 'skin off my nose' although it may wind up as 'the removal of the hide' from the Canadian Justice System if the court sees fit to duck this one.

b) What is germaine to my issue is the fact that with no filed response, in law my assertions must stand as fact as to the existence of a conspiracy to deprive me of my teaching career.

c) While disclosure is central to this charge of fraud; indeed, the charge cannot proceed without it; nonetheless, the refusal of over 50 judges to provide that key evidence has been at the heart of judicial malfeasance associated with this case. It is submitted here that such publication of this disclosure would lead to criminal charges of fraud brought against the defendant Employer and Union.

d) Without a Defense, the presiding judge may only request - should he deem that disclosure is necessary - that the RCMP, which has been kept fully apprised of this issue for years; seize those documents.

e) If the above action (d) is not activated, the proper course for the judge is to provide this plaintiff with the $20 million default claim which cannot be arbitrated without the Defendants.

Yours truly, (Roger Callow ) Plaintiff

TO: PREMIER FORD by fax (2 pages)

SEPTEMBER 19-2018 - annotated to reflect updates (Oct. 23-2018)

What Premier Doug Ford doesn't know about the Justice System which I have learned the hard way over the past 33 years

by: Roger Callow 'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Government and Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance in an unresolved legal issue.' employeescasecanada.ca

1) Ford is in a position of being 'dead right' and in that order. The point is that if one is first dead, who cares whether or not he is right?

2) It does not appear that Ford is getting very good legal advice; the key one being that one may not be critical of a judge personally due to his decision; that is what appeal courts are for.

3) What a litigant can be critical of is the process by which the court conducted itself. That's why I am able to file a civil case for fraud in Ontario listing two judges with the West Vancouver School Trustees being the 'engine' of this charge for $20 million. No legal counsel will represent the WVST (as well as in B.C. in a second $20 million action) under pain of being sued separately for $20 million. In this unprecedented manoeuvre; two judges are named in the conduct of that fraud along with Ontario legal counsel for the Employer dating from 2014. SEE website for details.

4) What Ford needs and hasn't got is a casus belli to justify his action of reducing Toronto City Council from 48 to 24 seats. (Oct. 23-2018; 'perverted 'court action led to his success)

5) In dealing with the Ford issue above, the presiding Justice is not limited to the 'notwithstanding clause' as many other factors can be cited in dealing with an issue. Indeed, I quoted the Charter on a number of occasions only to be ignored which is the prerogative of the presiding justice. In the unresolved Employee's Case; the matter was reduced to this litigant merely being frivolous and vexatious on matters already decided. As to which matters were decided, the School Trustees are never specific and, here's the key point, the court does not ever demand that they be specific. That's been the story for 33 years.

6) A side note to the above is that I am dunned for all legal costs which I have never paid considering that I have never received an invoice. The Trustees refuse to say if they paid these bills and the North Shore News Tabloid refuses to challenge them on this level.

7) Other than a personal animus on the part of the Premier, the only thing to warm the cockles of his heart is the loud-mouth braying of the Conservative media bent on selling papers.

8) First past the post is a vital point in law as trying to come from behind leaves a litigant carrying baggage difficult to dispose. Ford already has one court loss. I had the loss of the arbitration dealing with my senior teacher lay-off in 1985 despite the succeeding court quashing the arbitration ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable for failing to show a causal factor (this perp; this crime). I have been left in limbo since that ruling with no judge willing to act to draw a conclusion. In essence, they pick up the ball and go home before the game is completed. That's how the Justice System imploded in 2004 under the 'ultimate remedy' conditions before the Supreme Court of Canada. 'You have exhausted all remedy under the law' volunteered my legal representative.

9)Today, I am 'walking back the cat' with the two charges one being for judicial fraud; a challenge unequalled in the annals of any legal system as I hit directly at 'the process'.

10) It would seem that Ford has not put out the money for qualified legal help and is about to pay the price a second time as judges do not take kindly to any one judge being personally 'dissed'. (Oct.-23-2018: SEE Point 4)

11) For my part, it matters little to my welfare as to which way the winds blow for the Ford Government on this issue. The key advantage is that both of us, in our own ways, have revealed activist judges which have always permeated the system. As I put it; the Justice System imploded in 2004; corpse to follow. The now putrid corpse is currently following in B.C. and ON with the Employee's Case....

OCTOBER 23-2018 - SECOND APPEAL: CV 18000 76950 0000 (Ottawa Supreme Court) copy to Ottawa Sun columnist, Mark Bonokoski

1) Considering that the B.C. action mentioned above filed after the Ontario Action has been adjudicated (with much prejudice - see employeescasecanada.ca), why is there a delay in providing a written Decision in Ontario particularly considering that the Employer did not file for an appearance in either case?

2) Also in contrast to B.C. is the fact that the Ontario action lists two Ontario judges whose actions still go uncontested as to malfeasance and were a factor in other venues across Canada. The Ontario action, also in contrast to the B.C. action, is for civil fraud although production of the disclosure by the highly politicized RCMP would most likely lead to a criminal charge of fraud. Under those conditions, in the event of a successful suit, everything flowing from the imposed BILL 35 (1985) as used by the Employer in an illicit senior teacher lay-off in 1985 would be 'null and void'.

3) At heart of all court actions for 33 years has been the issue of disclosure (as is the case of the criminal trial against Vice Admiral Mark Norman but that trial continues with this difference; I have no media coverage. Is that what Canada has become?...a newspaper democracy?) Bonokoski, are you listening?

4) The proper course for the Ford government (all correspondence now goes to Premier Ford considering the abject performance of his A.G. Carolyn Mulroney on this file) is to place the Ontario Judiciary under a trusteeship until answers are forthcoming explaining why the above legal case appears to have disappeared down the proverbial black hole.

Yours truly, Roger Callow aka 'outlaw'

MARCH 20-2019 - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: CV 18000 76950 0000

1) The above case is stagnating awaiting a hearing date due to what can only be labeled as the malfeasance of Premier Ford plus his incompetent A.G., Caroline Mulroney abetted by an un-named Registry filing clerk whom refused to provide this plaintiff with a hearing date. What if every court jurisdiction e.g. LavScam decided on illegally foiling the holding of a trial?