OPEN
LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– SEPT.01 & 15 - 2014
(FORMERLY
OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN and U.S. NEWS)
JUDICIAL
LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)
BY: Roger Callow
‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com
(29 year unresolved legal case) now known
judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 8 different court
systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning
author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to
Registry and Ministry obfuscation. I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to
convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe
recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just
like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working.
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT (OTTAWA)
REPLY 25A -
#14-61592(2) September 15-2014 - September 23,2014 H.D.
PROPOSED
ORAL PRESENTATION - SEPTEMBER 01-2014 FOR ABOVE
'THE COURT
OF STAR CHAMBERS'
QUOTE:
'It is easy to be tolerant of the
principles of other people if you have none of your own.' Herbert Samuel
MOVED TO...
REPLY(2)#14-61592
URGENT
September 16-2014
TO: A) Hicks,
Morley et al for the Employer FAX
only: 613-234-0418
RESPONDENT 1
B) BCTF
on behalf of WVTA
RESPONDENT 2
FAX only:
604-871-2288
FROM:
Roger Callow www.employeescasecanada.com
APPLICANT
REFERENCE: #14-61592 scheduled and now confirmed for
September 23-2014 10:00 A.M. Ottawa
Superior Court
MESSAGE:
1) As of the
above date, no 'Notice of Hearing' has been received from either of the
Respondents. Nothing is on file at the court house on Elgin Street from either
Respondent.
2) Nor have
I received documents requested labeled 'secret memo notes' from the 1986 trial
which are the basis of my allegation of fraud against the original conspirators
and against the courts under the heading of 'systematic judicial abuse'.
3) I will
not support any last minute request for 'furtherance' by the court unless the
above requested documents are in my possession by Friday September 19-2014.
4) In the
event that there is no response to 3); I will request $22,000 damages to be
assigned against the Employer based on this parallel:
a) After 9
months, the Employer filed no evidence in the hearing of DT-12-1872 held on
November 4, 2013 where they were awarded $10,000 in special fees (as requested
by them) for an argument presented at the hearing which had very little bearing
on the judgment which is currently being appealed for costs only.
b) On April
10, 2014, the Employer launched an action (#13-59060) as the Applicant in which
they requested that all claims be considered by the court. The court did not
make any reference to this request and yet, once again, the court saw fit to
assign $12,000 in special fees (as requested by the Applicant) against this
Respondent. That case is being appealed both as to the action and the costs
which I claim should be reversed. Further, Judge C. McKinnon's action has been
forwarded to the Canadian Council of Judges for further review.
5) Under the
above circumstances, it would be expected that the Employer would appeal
#13-59060 as opposed to my own appeal to deal with 'all claims' under #14-61592.
How can the courts fail to recognize that both litigants to this matter are now
requesting a finalization of this long drawn-out legal affair?
6) As noted
to you in my factum, I have an offer on the table for this court to settle all
matters in this unresolved 19 year legal spectacle. By not filing an
appearance, the courts are free to act against the Respondents in any way they
wish. Is this what you want?
Yours truly,
Roger Callow APPLICANT
ADDENDUM
Sept.
22-2013
7) A check today with the court showed no filings on
behalf of the Respondents for tomorrow's hearing at 10:00 A.M. The case is to proceed
before Justice Scott.
8) I don't know what arrangements either of the
Respondents have made with the court; if any. Should the court wish to sanction
your position (for example, go for furtherance); I will vehemently oppose that
submission on the grounds that only the Respondent may make this request
through the proper court forum which requires an appearance. As such, the Court
may not act as an agent for the Respondents by referring to any other than
material presented in court by me as Applicant.
9) In the event that the court does not accept my private
offer to settle for a court arranged settlement with my compliance (as outlined
to you in materials in your hands); the offer will be withdrawn in court and a
request for the court to follow through with ordering the Respondents to
produce the 'secret memo notes' of which Order I made earlier in my submission.
These notes form the basis of my accusation
of fraud against the Respondents as well as the court processes over a
29 year period of this unresolved legal
case in which no compensation has been paid. This present case marks the first
time that this matter of fraud has been alleged and includes the role of
Ontario courts. It appears that an injunction must be issued in the above
regard to obtain these 'secret memo notes'.
10) Without the presence of the Respondent(s)
to claim that the 'vexatious' label of the McKinnon Court be applied; this court
is unable to act on that accord without being accused of being an agent for the
Respondent(s). If Hicks, Morley et al for the Employer had agreed to handling this
case as a 'special case' before 3 judges, a more serious legal approach could have
been used in this matter which now transgresses any other civil matter in Canadian
jurisprudence as both fraud on the part of the original conspirators as well as
the court processes is being alleged for a first time in this 29 year unresolved labour
matter. That is hardly a 'frivolous and vexatious' matter on the part of this Applicant.
Yours truly,
SENT BY FAX ONLY ON SEPTEMBER 22-2014
TO BOTH RESPONDENTS.